Well, you live and learn.
I got ridiculously excited about this camera partly, I suspect, because it is *so* beautiful. Bright and shiny and small, with smooth motion and very simple mechanisms. But each time you use a new camera you are, of course, unaware of its capabilities or limitations.
This camera and film combination, I have discovered, is not much good for taking pictures of people. But photographs of architecture, under the right conditions, can be lovely. The lens on my copy is not very sharp, nor the focusing very accurate or easy, but I suspect that beautiful results could be achieved with a rich colour film and some woodland / countryside.
Out and about in Norwich yesterday, I saw this chalkboard and the one in the shop window and thought them rather charming. This, I believe, is one of the shots that came out best.
This one, too, I liked, of the Belgian Monk and the church next to it.
The rest of the roll can be found here.
I have just done something that felt rather brave and risky. In a dark bag, I spooled some 35mm film onto a 127 spool and backing paper, and I’ve loaded it into the Comet. Another experiment in the offing…
These are great, Alice! I love the dreamy quality of the Comets. I have also been wanting to try to re-spool 35mm onto 127 backing. I think I read that you still have to cover the red window with black gaffer tape even if you use the backing paper because it’s more sensitive? I think! I could be wrong. I need to read about that again. You can take the tape off in subdued light when you need to advance the film to the next frame.
Well, it’s thanks to you, Juliet! If you hadn’t mentioned it by name, I wouldn’t have found myself idly searching for Bencini Comets on eBay, or putting in an offer on one…
I love it too. And after this film, I think I have a better handle on its capabilities.
Thanks for the tip, too. I’ve got the 35mm masking-taped to the backing paper, wound onto the spool and loaded into the camera, but I’ll make sure to cover the red window, too. Good tip! x